PRESS STATEMENT: Reaction to the Kennedy/White House Immigration Reform Compromise

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 17, 2007

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Ali Noorani, (617) 835-1402

Reaction to the Kennedy/White House Immigration Reform Compromise

The following is a statement of Ali Noorani, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA):

"The immigration deal struck by Senator Kennedy, some Republican Senators and the White House responds to the demands of the immigrant rights movement for a path to citizenship for undocumented workers now in the U.S., but its provisions on future migration to the United States are immoral, unworkable and unacceptable. While the proposal appears to include an important path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, recognizing their work and contribution to America, we find the elimination of the family immigration system, the establishment of a new temporary worker program that would create a permanent underclass of workers with few rights and no ability to become citizens, and the limitations on due process to be anti-family, anti-worker and fundamentally un-American.

"The Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition (MIRA) believes the following principles must guide legislative consideration of this and other proposals: simple and broad legalization for undocumented workers and families; strong worker protections and a path to citizenship for future immigrant workers; family reunification and continued preference for family-based immigration; preservation of due process and civil rights; and fair treatment of students and agricultural workers as embodied in the DREAM Act and AgJobs legislation. We will be continuing to pressure Congress to adopt humane immigration legislation that is consistent with these principles, and we are prepared to vigorously oppose legislation that is inconsistent with our values.

"MIRA is very grateful for the work of Senator Kennedy for his work to protect and welcome millions of immigrant families as full participants in our country. Still, we are deeply troubled by two reported aspects of the deal as we understand it:

"First, the architecture of the deal includes provisions that would fundamentally undo the family immigration system created in the 1965 immigration bill that allowed millions of working class people and people of color to immigrate to this country, and replace it with a "rich man’s immigration system" that would shift immigrant preference to high-skilled, English speaking people, and deny American citizens and immigrants the opportunity to bring loved family members into this nation. This is a violation of a fundamental, longstanding principle of American immigration policy, and of real family values.

"Second, the deal would not allow for a path to citizenship for future ‘guestworkers’ thereby creating a two-tier labor market that could undermine worker protections for all Americans. Such an approach could recreate problems of the disastrous bracero program, depress wages and working conditions for U.S. workers, and would be fundamentally inconsistent with American values of fair play and equal treatment.

"If these provisions are not fixed, this Congress will repeat the mistakes of past immigrant legislation that created the family backlogs, humanitarian border crisis and large undocumented population that a comprehensive immigration reform bill was intended to repair.

"These family and worker provisions must be fixed in any final comprehensive immigration reform bill. MIRA will fight to make these improvements. The immigrant rights movement, like the congressional immigration debate, is only just getting started."